Atrocious service from RAC breakdown and warranty
I broke down near Oxford with the car engulfed in smoke. Two fire engines and the highways agency arrived.
I called the RAC to inform them that I was stuck at the side of the motorway with my wife and 3 month old baby. I was told i was priority and relay would arrive within 30 minutes.
It was over an hour until a van turned up, following me having to make another call to see where the relay was.
When the relay arrived it was a vehicle with only two seats despite me having informed the RAC that i was with my wife and baby and therefore needed a vehicle that could hold a baby seat. It was also unable to tow my car, which is an automatic - something else that i informed the RAC over the telephone.
My wife and baby were taken to a nearby service station and i was told i would be picked up shortly by a truck with a flatbed in order to move my car.
I was left waiting for a further four hours by the side of the motorway despite frequent calls to the RAC to see where my relay was. I was told on two occasions that it would be 30 minutes more.
Meanwhile my wife was left at the services with our luggage and baby paraphernalia all that time, unable to go to the restroom or baby changing room as well as being unable to get any kind of refreshment due to being unwilling/unable to leave our luggage etc unmanned.
When relay finally arrived it was again unsuitable. While it was a flatbed truck, it could only hold two passengers - again despite the RAC being made aware of the fact that my wife and I had a baby with us.
I was taken from the motorway to the services to discover my wife and baby distressed and hungry, but left to wait a further 45 minutes for a third relay truck - this one with a flatbed and enough seats for the three of us.
Needless to say I am not happy with the level of service i received from the RAC.
What's more, I was informed by the relay mechanic that there would have been little warning that my turbo would go. Yet my RAC warranty has refused to pay to repair the damage, claiming it was my responsibility, despite the car having a sufficient service history to meet the requirements of my warranty agreement.
When I complained about the matter, I was informed that the car is "nine years old" and therefore such things should be expected.
If this is the case, I question why I have paid £250 a year for three years for a warranty that refuses to pay for damage to a nine-year old car. This is clearly a case of a policy being mis-sold.
I have been left without a car for nearly a month now, which has impacted upon my ability to get to work.
It is unacceptable that I should have been left for so long (7 days) while the initial claim was assessed. It took several phone calls from myself and the garage looking after the car before I finally got a response from the RAC, which was to decline my claim.
I will be seeking remuneration through the financial ombudsman over the level of service I have received as well as the fact that I have been mis-sold a policy.
Meanwhile I am still without a car and unable to go to work while I am left to dispute my claim.
Today I have just been informed by the garage that the turbo that the RAC returned this morning is not the turbo he sent to there assessors, luckily he took precautions in case this happened.
Originally Posted by jmerc
The Highways Agency SHOULD have done much much more to help you.
Was it a Motorway that you were on?
Yes it was on the motorway
Make a complaint to the Highways Agency about the manner in which they dealt with the incident.
You have lost me there Dennis.
Originally Posted by Dennis W
The breakdown company was RAC
The warranty was RAC
So how is it anything to do with anyone else?
I spoke to a Manager at the warranty division this afternoon and even though he agrees it can't be my turbo from the pictures provided by the specialist they employed to investigate. The RAC are sending another assessor to the garage where my car is (and has been there a month on Saturday) to assess it......can anyone understand this???
He also thinks it is a honest mistake but I am unsure of this due to the report submitted. The RAC specialists claim there was a shortage of oil which caused my turbo vane to seize but my mechanic showed me my turbo before it was collected and my turbo vane had snapped in two.
The turbo they have returned the vane is fully intact and seized......
Last edited by jmerc; 26-06-14 at 03:50.
The HA will normally do what they can, but they are not allowed to tow cars, and in any case the OP's car was an automatic so towing was not practical. Perhaps you could enlighten us with your ideas as to what they failed to do which warrants a complaint.
Originally Posted by Dennis W
The RAC on the other hand....
I went to the garage that has my car earlier to speak to the assessor. He wasn't at all interested in what I was saying; he dismissed the garage owner and me.
I asked him to look at the pictures the RAC specialist emailed me and begrudgingly he did. He said the pics only looked different due to the angles of the photos. I asked him to examine the turbo and he refused saying he was only there to get numbers from it.
I explained that my turbo vane was broken and loose yet the turbo returned was seized solid, he claimed the company who diagnosed the turbo always put it back together properly before shipping any unit and during that process it could have seized.
The paperwork from the RAC specialist had instructions to fit a Peugeot turbo but my car is a Mercedes, again I asked the assessor for his opinion and he claimed it was probably a mix up or the fitting instructions were the same for both cars.
After all this I insisted he spoke to his boss who in the end decided they should take the turbo away for further examination.
I called the RAC to speak to the case manager who was not in work today, I asked to speak to the Manager who passed on the claim but again he was off today.
Last edited by jmerc; 28-06-14 at 14:44.
If it was a matter of life-or-death would the Highways Agency use their initiative and tow a vehicle a short distance to remove a serious hazard?
In the Mersey Tunnels, it is my belief that the Mersey Tunnel Police would remove an obstructing vehicle in order to keep the traffic moving.
Irrespective of where this took place your post echoes many others now appearing on this forum and no doubt Facebook and others.
Originally Posted by jmerc
Most of us on here will tell you NEVER to buy ANY aftermarket warranty as, in the main, they are worthless. However, having sold you the warranty and being fully aware of the age, mileage etc of your car, they are in my view guilty of mis-selling if they will not pay out. I wonder just what they would pay out on if not this problem?
The response is another example of the ever deteriorating service that this company aims to provide. The ridiculous wait and the **** ups with the the various recovery trucks seems to be the norm. You can see more complaints in the feedback section on this forum plus dozens of other complaints of a similar tone.
I agree you should contact the Ombudsman but ultimately, the RAC is part of a bigger group where only the shareholders matter. If you are really lucky, one of the admin team may read your post and reply.